|
|
本帖最后由 Reader86 于 2024-12-2 12:29 AM 编辑
Restitutions of the Truth in Pointure , what did Derrida saynin the essay.
15 web pages
1,In his essay "Restitutions of the Truth in Pointing [Pointure]," Jacques Derrida engages with the philosophical debate over Vincent van Gogh's painting of shoes, primarily focusing on the interpretations provided by Martin Heidegger and Meyer Schapiro. Here are some key points from Derrida's discussion:
2,Interpretation of Van Gogh's Shoes: Derrida examines Heidegger's reading of Van Gogh's painting in "The Origin of the Work of Art," where Heidegger describes the shoes as belonging to a peasant woman, emphasizing the theme of truth as unconcealment and the ontological significance of the artwork. Derrida, however, questions the validity of this interpretation by pointing out that Heidegger did not consider the entire body of Van Gogh's work or the context provided by Van Gogh's own letters, where he mentions painting his own shoes.
3,The Notion of Pointure: Derrida uses the term "pointure," which can refer to the size of a shoe, but in his context, it metaphorically addresses the act of pointing or designating meaning in art. This term encapsulates Derrida's critique on how meaning is ascribed to art. He explores how the act of 'pointing' or directing attention to something in a work of art involves a restitutional process, where interpretations attempt to 'return' or 'restitute' the truth.
4,Critique of Heidegger's Position: Derrida critiques Heidegger's approach for its apparent disregard for the artist's own perspective or other works by Van Gogh on similar subjects. He suggests that Heidegger's analysis projects a preconceived notion of peasant life and authenticity onto the painting, essentially ignoring the artist's own life experiences and other potential interpretations.
5,The Role of the Frame: Derrida discusses the concept of the "parergon," which refers to elements like frames that are neither entirely inside nor outside the artwork but necessary for its presentation and interpretation. This idea contributes to his broader philosophical theme of the supplement and the undecidability of boundaries in art and text.
6,Questioning Truth in Art: Derrida challenges the idea of a singular, definitive truth in art. He uses the notion of 'pointure' to argue that meaning in art is not fixed but is instead contingent, negotiated through various interpretative acts. This aligns with his deconstructive philosophy where texts (and by extension, artworks) are open to multiple readings and meanings are not inherent but constructed through interpretation.
7,Restitution as an Act of Interpretation: Derrida's use of "restitution" involves the idea that interpretations seek to 'return' or attribute meaning to the artwork. However, he shows that this act of restitution is complex, often leading to a restitutional cycle where one interpretation leads to another, creating a tapestry of meanings rather than a singular truth.
8.Derrida's essay, therefore, not only engages with the specific debate about Van Gogh’s shoes but also serves as a broader commentary on how meaning is made, lost, and remade in the field of art criticism and beyond, questioning the essence of truth in representation.
|
|
发表于 2024-12-1 23:20:29
楼主