|
|
Jordan Peterson
Re: my understanding of Jordan Peterson: political and postmodernism
1, as Jordan Perterson's defines it: Political Correctness is a paradoxical amalgam of postmodernism, which is originated as a form of philosophic and literary criticism, and Marxism, neo-Marxism.
2, postmodernism primary doctrine: there are an infinite number of ways to interpret a finite set of phenomena.
postmodernism is Intellectual capable.
primary doctrine was put forth by Derrida, which is from his language theory that a a signified has an infinite number of signifiers, is true, as Jordan Perterson was assertive.
According to this, it is very difficult for human being to develop artificial intelligence, to make machines that could operate in real environments.
This one is already bedevil the AI myth that a computer is capable to control human being. Luguo will be crying. That is why she does not like me, because I always pop her bubbles.
This one also kills artificial design supported by 14, AKA shaizi, but I know he will not concern too much.
3, postmodernism secondary doctrine: none of the interpretations can be privileged above any others.
4, not, that is wrong. There are constrains to make some of the interpretations not viable.
5, a million years of evolution is to make living creatures to kill things that are bad enough to die.
6, to live is to kill bad interpretations.
7, to live with others also constrains the interpretations.
8, john Piaget, a psychologist, side, no need to elaborate.
9, the central claim of Marxism (align with post-modernism) the best way to view the world is through the lens of oppressed and oppressor.
10, post-modernism does not get a conical interpretations, why you allow the lens of oppressed and oppressor get better of ant other interpretations (contradicting #s above)?
11, Why post-modernism allow its deconstruction of philosophy to remain nested in Marxism?
12, if you read derrida, if you look into intellectual history of the post-modernism movement of the 1970s, you will find post-modernism is merged out of an underlying frame work of Marxism.
13, post-modernism movement is sincerely trying to help the oppressed.
14, by the end of 1960s, as boneheaded as Jean-Paul Sartra, French intellectuals have to agree that if you concern for the oppressed, you have to buy the tenets of Marxism as a functional economical and political doctrine.
15, But no French intellectuals would do that! The cap is put on it by Alexandra social net in middle 1970s.
16, no one buys it! post-modernism compassion uses as a default the doctrines of murderers beyond believe.
17, but some universities learned nothing from the past from 200,000,000 dead lives in 20th century.
18, Alternative: Nietzsche figures out a way more than 100 years ago:
Thus I speak to you in a parable-you who make souls whirl, you preachers of equality. To me you are tarantulas, and secretly vengeful. But I shall bring your secrets to light; therefore I laugh in your faces with my laughter of the heights. Therefore I tear at your webs, that your rage may lure you out of your lie-holes and your revenge may leap out from behind your word justice. For that man be delivered from revenge, that is for me the bridge to the highest hope, and a rainbow after long storms.
The tarantulas, of course, would have it otherwise. "What justice means to us is precisely that the world be filled with the storms of our revenge"-thus they speak to each other. "We shall wreak vengeance and abuse on all whose equals we are not"-thus do the tarantula-hearts vow. "And 'will to equality' shall henceforth be the name for virtue; and against all that has power we want to raise our clamor!"
You preachers of equality, the tyrannomania of impotence clamors thus out of you for equality: your most secret ambitions to be tyrants thus shroud themselves in words of virtue. Aggrieved conceit, repressed envy-perhaps the conceit and envy of your fathers-erupt from you as a flame and as the frenzy of revenge.
Friedrich Nietzsche Thus Spoke Zarathustra 1883
19, You preachers of equality!!!
20, For post-modernism, their world is nothing but power!
21, there are people more respected than others.
22, For post-modernism, it is their resentment, and demand for power, not compassion!
|
|
发表于 2023-9-6 13:01:33